Unraveling the Mysteries of Matter at APS March Meeting 2012
Explore the DiscoveriesEvery year, the American Physical Society (APS) hosts one of the largest gatherings of physicists on the planet—the March Meeting. The 2012 edition, held from February 27 to March 2 in Boston, Massachusetts, brought together thousands of brilliant minds to share groundbreaking research that would shape the future of science and technology 1 .
This meeting wasn't just about presenting abstract theories; it was where fundamental discoveries met practical applications, where the boundaries of what we know about the physical universe were pushed outward in dozens of simultaneous sessions covering everything from the behavior of subatomic particles to the largest structures in the cosmos.
The APS March Meeting 2012 served as both a snapshot of where physics stood in the second decade of the 21st century and a preview of where it was headed. From quantum computing breakthroughs that promised to revolutionize technology to heated discussions about science policy and public engagement, this event encapsulated the dynamic, collaborative, and occasionally contentious nature of modern physical research.
Researchers presenting findings at a scientific conference
The 2012 APS March Meeting presented a rich tapestry of interdisciplinary research, reflecting how physics increasingly blends with other fields like biology, materials science, and engineering. With nearly 900 sessions covering everything from superconductivity to biological physics, the meeting offered an overwhelming but inspiring menu of scientific discovery 1 .
One of the most prominent themes was the rapid advancement of quantum computing. Multiple sessions were dedicated to quantum information processing, with significant progress reported in improving qubit coherence times and developing novel architectures for quantum systems.
The meeting highlighted the growing importance of physics in understanding biological systems. Sessions on biological physics explored how physical principles govern biological processes, from molecular motors to neural networks.
In materials physics, researchers presented advances in understanding and developing novel materials with extraordinary properties. Sessions on superconductivity revealed progress in both fundamental understanding and applications of high-temperature superconductors.
Research Area | Number of Sessions | Key Advances Reported |
---|---|---|
Quantum Computation | 40+ | Multi-qubit coherence, 3D cavity QED |
Biological Physics | 30+ | Protein dynamics, molecular machines |
Soft Matter | 50+ | Novel polymers, self-assembly techniques |
Superconductivity | 45+ | New materials, improved critical temperatures |
Condensed Matter Physics | 100+ | Topological insulators, graphene applications |
Among the thousands of presentations at the meeting, one particularly compelling experiment stood out for its ingenuity and implications for the future of quantum computing: the three-mode circuit quantum electrodynamics (QED) system developed by a Yale University research team 4 .
To appreciate this experiment, we first need to understand circuit QED. This field combines superconducting circuits with quantum electrodynamics, the theory describing how light and matter interact. In simpler terms, researchers create artificial atoms (qubits) using superconducting electrical circuits that can maintain quantum states—and then make these "atoms" interact with microwave photons confined in resonators (essentially tiny cavities).
The Yale team's innovation involved creating a system with two three-dimensional microwave resonators coupled to a single transmon qubit (a type of superconducting qubit designed for better coherence times) 4 . This more complex architecture represented a significant step toward the multi-component systems needed for practical quantum computation.
The team created the transmon qubit and microwave resonators using nanofabrication techniques on superconducting materials, which must be kept at extremely low temperatures to maintain their quantum properties.
The entire system was cooled to cryogenic temperatures in a dilution refrigerator, isolating it from environmental noise that could disrupt fragile quantum states.
The researchers used precise microwave pulses to manipulate the quantum state of the system. They could excite the qubit, transfer its state to the resonators, or create entangled states between different components.
Through careful measurements of how the system responded to different microwave frequencies, the team could map out its energy structure and quantum dynamics.
The experiment yielded several important results that marked significant progress toward practical quantum computing:
The team demonstrated that each mode of their system had sufficient anharmonicity—a crucial property that allows researchers to address individual quantum states without disturbing others 4 .
They measured the coherence times of excitations in each mode and observed how these were affected by excitations in other parts of the system 4 .
Perhaps most impressively, the team showed they could use the state-dependent frequency shifts to read out the quantum state of one mode using another. This capability is essential for quantum computing, where you need to measure the final state of your system without disturbing it prematurely 4 .
Parameter | Value Achieved | Significance for Quantum Computing |
---|---|---|
Qubit Coherence Time | ~1-3 microseconds | Determines how long computations can run |
State Preparation Fidelity | >99% | Affects accuracy of computation results |
Single-Shot Measurement Fidelity | >98% | Crucial for reading out final results |
Cross-Talk Between Modes | Manageable level | Allows individual addressing of components |
Entanglement Generation Time | <100 nanoseconds | Enables rapid quantum operations |
This experiment represented more than just incremental progress. By successfully operating and characterizing a multi-mode quantum system, the Yale team addressed one of the fundamental challenges in building practical quantum computers: scaling up from individual qubits to interconnected systems while maintaining quantum coherence and control fidelity.
The research demonstrated that 3D cavity architectures offered a promising path toward more complex quantum systems. Unlike earlier 2D structures, the 3D approach provided better coherence properties and more natural isolation between components—advantages that have since been exploited in IBM, Google, and Rigetti's quantum processor designs.
Building quantum systems like the three-mode circuit QED experiment requires specialized tools and materials. Here's a look at some of the key "research reagents" and their functions:
Artificial atoms that serve as quantum bits. More stable than earlier qubit designs.
3D cavities that store microwave photons. Provide long-lived quantum memory elements.
Create ultra-cold environments (~10 mK). Eliminate thermal noise that destroys quantum states.
Produce precise control pulses. Manipulate quantum states with high fidelity.
Boost tiny quantum signals above noise floor. Enable measurement of fragile quantum states.
Enable lossless current flow. Prevent energy dissipation in quantum components.
Tool/Material | Function in Quantum Experiments | Why It's Important |
---|---|---|
Transmon Qubits | Artificial atoms that serve as quantum bits | More stable than earlier qubit designs |
Niobium-based Resonators | 3D cavities that store microwave photons | Provide long-lived quantum memory elements |
Dilution Refrigerators | Create ultra-cold environments (~10 mK) | Eliminate thermal noise that destroys quantum states |
Microwave Generators | Produce precise control pulses | Manipulate quantum states with high fidelity |
Parametric Amplifiers | Boost tiny quantum signals above noise floor | Enable measurement of fragile quantum states |
Superconducting Materials | Enable lossless current flow | Prevent energy dissipation in quantum components |
Beyond the technical presentations, the APS March Meeting 2012 also hosted important discussions about the relationship between science and society. In one particularly notable session titled "Broader Impacts of Research-NSF Policy and Individual Responsibility," experts explored scientists' obligations to communicate their work and consider its societal implications 3 .
Alan Leshner, then CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), delivered a keynote address emphasizing that while scientists engage in research for diverse reasons, "society only supports the enterprise because it benefits humankind" 3 .
He argued that this reality creates an ethical imperative for scientists to engage with the public, sharing not just their results but also the scientific process and its implications. This requires moving beyond one-way communication to genuine dialogue that acknowledges public concerns and finds common ground where possible 3 .
The session also addressed the National Science Foundation's (NSF) requirement that grant proposals include a "Broader Impacts" section describing how the research will benefit society. This policy encourages researchers to consider the societal value of their work beyond pure knowledge advancement.
Discussions explored how physicists could effectively fulfill this requirement through activities like science education outreach, policy engagement, and pursuing applications of basic research that address societal challenges.
Scientists engaging with the public to communicate research findings
The 2012 APS March Meeting offered more than just a snapshot of physics at a particular moment; it provided a window into the future of the field.
The groundbreaking experiments presented, like the three-mode circuit QED system from Yale, pointed toward concrete paths for advancing technology while deepening our understanding of fundamental quantum phenomena.
Nearly a decade later, we can see how many of the ideas presented at this meeting have borne fruit. The 3D cavity approach to quantum computing has become mainstream, with companies like IBM using similar architectures in their current quantum processors. The emphasis on multi-component quantum systems has evolved into the race for quantum advantage.
Beyond the technical achievements, the meeting's discussions about science communication and broader impacts reflected a discipline increasingly aware of its place in society and responsibilities to it. This maturation may prove just as important as any technical breakthrough, ensuring continued public support for the basic research that enables future innovations.
As we look toward the next decade of physics research, the 2012 March Meeting stands as a reminder that scientific progress depends not just on individual brilliance but on the collaborative ecosystem of ideas, criticism, and inspiration that conferences like this one foster. The quantum leaps announced in Boston continue to reverberate through laboratories and lecture halls worldwide, inspiring the next generation of physicists to build on these discoveries and take us closer to solving some of the universe's most profound mysteries.
The American Physical Society, founded in 1899, continues to advance and diffuse knowledge of physics through its meetings, publications, and advocacy . Its March Meeting remains one of the most important annual events in the physics calendar, showcasing the field's continuous evolution and expanding horizons.